There are many types of ethics and many ways to incorporate practices to enforce ethics as well as punish violators of ethics requirements. Two categories of ethics that are similar yet different are ethics in Corporate America and ethics in the United States Air Force (U. S. A. F. ).
First, we need to understand what ethics are. Ethics contributes to the learning what is right or wrong. “Doing the right thing is not as straight forward as conveyed in a great deal of business ethics literature”(McNamara, C. 2003, 6). The definition between corporations and the military provides us with a general description of ethics. Are military and corporate ethics different?Business Ethics in Corporate AmericaThe Business ethics concept means many things to many different people.
It is coming to know what is “right or wrong in the workplace and doing what is right — this is in regard to effects of products/services and in relationships with stakeholders” (McNamara, C. 2003, 8 ). “According to Carter McNamara, business ethics is summarized into “Two Broad Areas of Business Ethics” defined as managerial mischief and moral mazes. ” (McNamara, C. 2003, 10).
The first discussion will be managerial mischief. “Madsen and Shafritz, in their book "Essentials of Business Ethics" (Penguin Books, 1990) further explain that "managerial mischief" includes "illegal, unethical, or questionable practices of individual managers or organizations as well as the causes of such behaviors and remedies to eradicate them" (McNamara, C. 2003,10). Business ethics is merely teaches the basics of what is wrong and right.
Business ethics is a matter of dealing with situations that have no clear indication of what is wrong or right. Moral mazes of management include the many ethical situations that managers deal with daily. The wrongful use of resources and mismanagement of contracts and agreements, potential conflicts of interest, etc. cause many problems in the workplace.
Case Study #1 – Contract Conflict of InterestsThe following case study shows a potential “conflict of interest” on a contract, and shows how an organization handled identifying and resolving the conflict in a positive way. Alan Rose is a Senior Logistics Analyst with Dynamic Research Corporation, a company that provides logistics analysis as one of its key services. He is currently under contract to support the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program Office performing simulation and analysis of all logistical assets to include Supply, Manpower, and Support Equipment. His company has been under the same general contract for several years. In the last year, the prime contractor has determined there is a requirement to build a separate simulation tool, which will support their supply and supply chain management analysis.
This will be separate from the work done under the general contract. The JSF Program Office had established a new contract and Alan’s company won this contract. The contract required that both teams remain separated and not share data or information. The first attempt at isolating the teams had the first group of analyst move their office from one floor of the building to the other.
However, for contract/legal purposes this was not a complete solution. The result determined that the first team would be relocated from their new office location to another company building located several miles away. Ethics in the Military”Military ethics is rooted in three Os: owing, ordering, and oughting. “(Toner, 2003, 4) “Military ethics is about knowing whom and what we owe. Military ethics cannot properly exist without the concept of owing.
If we know why we owe what we do, we are able to recognize the obligation, responsibility, and duty .