Recent research indicates that dream content reflects problems that the dreamer experiences in life, and the function of such dreams is to facilitate the emotional resolution of the problems. The most recent method was developed for use with adult populations, and involves simply asking subjects to write down the last dream they can remember having, “whether it was last night, last week, or last month”(Domhoff, 1996, p. 310; Domhoff & Schneider, 1995). The subjects are also asked to write down the date and times that they recall the dreams.
The survey included many sub-samples ranging from 25 all the way to 250 dreams from Hall and Van de Castle’s(1966) normative sample of 500 dreams. These dreams were provided by 100 college men between the ages of 18 and 22. Samples of 100 to 125 single dreams from each subject came close to duplicating the norms. Another study of 100 most recent dreams written down by college women between the ages of 18 and 25 at the University of California, Santa Cruz, in the early 1990’s showed the findings did not differ from the Hall and Van de Castle(1966) female norms based on 500 dream reports provided by 100 college women between 18 and 22. The methods used for the survey kept the students in a natural environment allowing the students to feel comfortable and at ease.
The teacher would introduce the sample taker to the students. The sample taker would then explain what they were doing and would come back and explain the results to the students once the survey was completed. The students reacted positively by asking questions which she(surveyor) answered. After the students had asked all of their questions she passed out the Most Recent Dream Form and read the instructions to the students. This resulted in 272 samples being taken between 16 classrooms. Once collected, the samples were coded for quantitative dream content analysis by the first and second authors.
By the “method of agreement”(Domhoff, 1996, p. 28) in which the number agreed-upon codes made by two coders is divided by the sum of all their codes. If there was a difference in the coding, the surveyors discussed and resolved the difference. The results of the survey demonstrated that of all the girls and boys interviewed only 57% could not or would not recall a recent dream. That is why the survey had to entail 16 classrooms to net enough samples to have a credible result. The dream reports were measured by time and showed that it took younger people(12 – 13 years old) longer to write down a dream than it took young adults.
The gender similarities and differences found in the present study are consistent with those in the Hall and Van de Castle(1966) norms for young adults. These findings support the usefulness of most recent dream reports from teenagers in scientific investigations. They also fit with Foulkes'(1982, pp. 184, 217).
The percentage of dream reports in three different length categories for girls, women, men and boys are as follows. Girls over 200 words 28%, 50-199 words 64. 5%, under 50 words is 7. 5%; Women over 200 words 15%, 50 – 199 words 77. 8%, under 50 words was 7%; Boys over 200 words 10%, 50 – 199 64.
3%, under 50 words 25. 7%; and finally Men over 200 words 10. 7%, 50 – 199 words 78. 9%, and under 50 words was 10. 4%. Cognitive psychologists are concerned with logic and thought processing during dreaming, and how they are different from mental processes during the waking state.
In studies of the developmental cognitive processes of children’s dreams,