Art is the representation of the many elements of human life. It is the look of emotion, the representation of objects or landscapes, life experiences and it can besides be the representation of people and events. Identity can be represented every bit good as constructed in the ocular humanistic disciplines. Many creative persons are able to make this in diverse and single ways. Patricia Piccinini ‘s controversial graphicss explore the individuality and contrast between human and carnal life. David Hockney ‘s exposure collage illustrates a really different attack to stand for and build individuality. His graphics explores this construct through a narrative based graphics that represents life ‘s single journey each must take in order to build one ‘s true individuality.
However, it is non merely these two creative persons that explore individuality. There are legion creative persons who explore individuality in a assortment of ways. Some more elusive than others. This is because individuality can be explored in so many different ways. Identity can be seen as a national individuality, community individuality, cultural, physical, professional, single, sexual-orientation or matrimonial position etc. There are many creative persons that explore these individualities. Piccinini has explored the physical individuality and relationship between homo and animate being. Whereas Hockney has explored the single individuality, and the way we journey through our lives
Identity can be defined as single features by which a individual is recognised or known. “ Art is a mirror image of a individual ‘s individuality, circle of influence, and perceived universes or realities.A Art reflects what we feel, think, pattern, believe, or imagine ” ( Gaskins, N. 2010 ) .A Both Patricia Piccinini and David Hockney represent this in different ways by taking different attacks. Piccinini ‘s work is known for her extravagant and controversial life-like sculptures which present a more obvious significance than that of Hockney. Through the usage of symbolism, Hockney ‘s exposure collage creates a more elusive representation of individuality. It is merely with more analysis that Hockney ‘s creative activity can be more understood. Although the audience positions can change in decision as each person can comprehend this narrative type graphics and relate to the journey offered and constructed in different ways.
The Young Family ( 2002-3 )
“ Apart from the image that is represented, there is frequently a 2nd significance within the graphics ” , ( Clack, M. 2010 ) . At a glimpse ; the work of Patricia Piccinini is upseting and questionable, therefore the ground for the controversial positions. However if looked at with more deepness and analysis, her graphicss become interestingly prosecuting. The manner in which she represents and concepts individuality is far different to other creative persons. ‘Patricia Piccinini is an creative person who explores the frontiers of scientific discipline and engineering through her sculptures, exposure and picture environments ‘ ( Kent, R. 2002 ) . Within her graphics she is able to build a powerful message ; that enables her to show personal position on a subject. ‘The work makes public something other than itself ; it manifests something other ; it is an fable ‘ ( Clack, M. 2010 ) .
‘Personal individuality and the issues environing it lie at the nucleus of Piccinini ‘s undertaking. Her plants invite the inquiry: what is it that makes us who we are? ‘ ( Kent, R. 2002 ) . Her graphics titled, ‘The Young Family ‘ ( 2003 ) has sparked a batch of contention because of the many positions it represents. Her life-like imagination is ‘about via medias – about being able to happen beauty in a universe which can ne’er be perfect. ‘ ( Papastergiadis, N. 2002 ) . This graphics explores the differentiation between animate being and human features. The similarities of both individualities are obvious, which is what Patricia Piccinini is seeking to portray. In a political and scientific position ‘the inspiration behind this work is the outlook that we have of turning human variety meats in other species ‘ ( Piccinini, P. 2003 ) . In this graphics maternity is one of the traits we portion with animate beings ; Patricia Piccinini has obviously shown this. “ From man-made landscapes to unreal life signifiers, Piccinini creates a universe in which fact, fiction and fantasy co-exist. She begs the inquiry: what, in our quickly altering universe, constitutes ‘the existent ‘ anyhow? ” ( Kent, R. 2002 ) .
Pearblossom Hwy ( 1986 )
David Hockney ‘s graphics, “ Pearblossom Hwy ‘ approaches the representation of individuality in another manner. ‘Hockney ‘s work clearly depicts his life and his love 1s ” ( Research Paper 2008 ) . Represented in his graphics is a timeline of single life on Earth. He identifies that persons have many waies they need to be necessarily travelled with many obstructions on the manner. The art work consists of a batch of symbolism. Hockney has used the assorted stop marks in order to stand for the persons ain life obstructions. In life many people will halt to believe, is this determination I ‘m about to do the right one? What way should I follow next? Who am I as an person? etc.
One of the many positions this graphics offers is that “ the montage is seeking to state that in the beginning of life, people are unknowing of what they will make in their hereafter or that they are lost in life. The terminal of the main road symbolizes certainty and strength about one ‘s life ” . ( Research Paper 2008 ) . Hockney ‘s art is created for his viewing audiences. “ His drawings are designed in a particular manner so that they can be animated to be in the head of the spectator ” ( Research Paper 2008 ) . David Hockney ‘s purpose is to take the audience on a journey that he has created, but one that means something different to each person. This journey is the geographic expedition of individuality. He has captured within this graphics the similarities in life ‘s journeys, but it is how each single interprets the narrative. “ Identity varies from society to society and single to single as fluctuation of systems or personality ” ( Art. 2010 ) .
In comparing to Patricia Piccinini ‘s graphics, ‘The immature household ‘ , Hockney ‘s graphics relates entirely to each person. It explores legion narrative lines as the reading of his graphics differs for each audience member. The individuality he explores is more easy related to than that of Piccinini. Patricia ‘s mentality on individuality explores the similarities between homo and animate being features, really similar to the development theory, the apes ‘ passage into human signifier. “ Ideas about nature and its simulation are cardinal to Piccinini ‘s plants, ask foring us to oppugn what is ‘real ‘ and what is non ” ( Kent, R. 2002 ) . Whereas Hockney ‘s, ‘Pearblossom Hwy ‘ explores the construct of ‘what will the person ‘s hereafter bring? Who am I? Who will I go? ‘ . It is more an intimate contemplation of one ‘s ego.
In decision, there are many creative persons who explore and represent individuality in many signifiers and techniques. So in measuring what is art. Many believe that it is the representation of the many elements of human life such as emotions, objects or landscapes, life experiences, people and events. Patricia Piccinini and David Hockney, while they both explore individuality, their thoughts and positions are wholly different. Patricia Piccinini ‘s controversial graphicss explore the individuality and contrast between human and carnal life. While David Hockney ‘s exposure collage illustrates a narrative based graphics that represents life ‘s single journey each must take in order to build one ‘s true individuality.