The Bill of Rights Essay

Published: 2021-06-29 02:09:59
essay essay

Category: Society

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Word Count: 3895How many rights do you have? You shouldcheck, because it might not be as many today as it was afew years ago, or even a few months ago. Some people Italk to are not concerned that police will execute a searchwarrant without knocking or that they set up roadblocks andstop and interrogate innocent citizens.
They do not regardthese as great infringements on their rights. But when you putcurrent events together, there is information that may besurprising to people who have not yet been concerned: Theamount of that is under attack is alarming. Let’s take a look at The Bill of Rights Essay and see which aspectsare being pushed on or threatened. The point here is not thedegree of each attack or its rightness or wrongness, but thesheer number of rights that are under attack.
Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment ofreligion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridgingthe freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of thepeople peaceably to assemble, and to petition theGovernment for a redress of grievances. ESTABLISHINGRELIGION: While campaigning for his first term, GeorgeBush said ;I don’t know that atheists should be consideredas citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. " Bush hasnot retracted, commented on, or clarified this statement, inspite of requests to do so. According to Bush, this is onenation under God.
And apparently if you are not withinBush’s religious beliefs, you are not a citizen. Federal, state,and local governments also promote a particular religion (or,occasionally, religions) by spending public money onreligious displays. FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION:Robert Newmeyer and Glenn Braunstein were jailed in 1988for refusing to stand in respect for a judge. Braunstein saysthe tradition of rising in court started decades ago whenjudges entered carrying Bibles. Since judges no longer carryBibles, Braunstein says there is no reason to stand — and hisBible tells him to honor no other God. For this religiouspractice, Newmeyer and Braunstein were jailed and are nowsuing.
FREE SPEECH: We find that technology has giventhe government an excuse to interfere with free speech. Claiming that radio frequencies are a limited resource, thegovernment tells broadcasters what to say (such as newsand public and local service programming) and what not tosay (obscenity, as defined by the Federal CommunicationsCommission FCC). The FCC is investigating Boston PBSstation WGBH-TV for broadcasting photographs from theMapplethorpe exhibit. FREE SPEECH: There are also lawsto limit political statements and contributions to politicalactivities.
In 1985, the Michigan Chamber of Commercewanted to take out an advertisement supporting a candidatein the state house of representatives. But a 1976 Michiganlaw prohibits a corporation from using its general treasuryfunds to make independent expenditures in a politicalcampaign. In March, the Supreme Court upheld that law. According to dissenting Justice Kennedy, it is now a felonyin Michigan for the Sierra Club, the American Civil LibertiesUnion, or the Chamber of Commerce to advise the publichow a candidate voted on issues of urgent concern to theirmembers.
FREE PRESS: As in speech, technology hasprovided another excuse for government intrusion in thepress. If you distribute a magazine electronically and do notprint copies, the government doesn’t consider you a pressand does not give you the same protections courts haveextended to printed news. The equipment used to publishPhrack, a worldwide electronic magazine about phones andhacking, was confiscated after publishing a document copiedfrom a Bell South computer entitled "A Bell South StandardPractice (BSP) 660-225-104SV Control OfficeAdministration of Enhanced 911 Services for SpecialServices and Major Account Centers, March, 1988. " All ofthe information in this document was publicly available fromBell South in other documents. The government has notalleged that the publisher of Phrack, Craig Neidorf, wasinvolved with or participated in the copying of the document.
Also, the person who copied this document from telephonecompany computers placed a copy on a bulletin board runby Rich Andrews. Andrews forwarded a copy to AT&Tofficials and cooperated with authorities fully. In return, theSecret Service (SS) confiscated Andrews’ computer alongwith all the mail and data that were on it. Andrews was notcharged with any crime.
FREE PRESS: In another incidentthat would be comical if it were not true, on March 1 the SSransacked the offices of Steve Jackson Games (SJG);irreparably damaged property; and confiscated threecomputers, two laser printers, several hard disks, and manyboxes of paper .

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read